Usman Khan betting stats, splits & projections
Bowler
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 29 | 462 | 394 | 22.0 | 117.3 | 14.0 | 37.6 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 619 | 740 | 53 | 7.2 | 14.0 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where Usman Khan scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Venue: Marsa Sports Club (T20)MEDIUM sample
266 runs off 202 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 131.7 vs 117.3 overall, average 53.2 vs 22.0 overall.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
296 runs off 232 balls in 26 T20 matches — strike rate 127.6 vs 117.3 overall, average 21.1 vs 22.0 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)MEDIUM sample
228 runs off 167 balls in 22 T20 matches — strike rate 136.5 vs 117.3 overall, average 16.3 vs 22.0 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)MEDIUM sample
132 runs off 127 balls in 20 T20 matches — strike rate 103.9 vs 117.3 overall, average 26.4 vs 22.0 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
204 runs off 202 balls in 20 T20 matches — strike rate 101.0 vs 117.3 overall, average 29.1 vs 22.0 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Malta | T20 | 7 | 141 | 116 | 23.5 | 121.6 | 14.7 | 37.9 | LOW |
| Romania | T20 | 3 | 70 | 60 | 70.0 | 116.7 | 11.7 | 33.3 | LOW |
| Belgium | T20 | 3 | 52 | 55 | 17.3 | 94.5 | 10.9 | 50.9 | LOW |
| Switzerland | T20 | 2 | 63 | 40 | — | 157.5 | 27.5 | 30.0 | LOW |
Bowling
| Malta | T20 | 104 | 106 | 13 | 6.1 | 8.2 | LOW |
| Portugal | T20 | 72 | 118 | 4 | 9.8 | 29.5 | LOW |
| Luxembourg | T20 | 66 | 69 | 5 | 6.3 | 13.8 | LOW |
| Belgium | T20 | 54 | 71 | 4 | 7.9 | 17.8 | LOW |
| Norway | T20 | 53 | 48 | 8 | 5.4 | 6.0 | LOW |
| Switzerland | T20 | 48 | 46 | 2 | 5.8 | 23.0 | LOW |
| Romania | T20 | 36 | 49 | 2 | 8.2 | 24.5 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Marsa Sports Club | T20 | 7 | 266 | 202 | 53.2 | 131.7 | 17.3 | 33.7 | MEDIUM |
| Dreux Sport Cricket Club | T20 | 4 | 56 | 56 | 18.7 | 100.0 | 10.7 | 46.4 | LOW |
| Santarem Cricket Ground | T20 | 5 | 40 | 33 | 10.0 | 121.2 | 12.1 | 36.4 | LOW |
| Roma Cricket Ground | T20 | 2 | 38 | 31 | 19.0 | 122.6 | 12.9 | 35.5 | LOW |
Bowling
| Marsa Sports Club | T20 | 128 | 129 | 13 | 6.0 | 9.9 | LOW |
| Santarem Cricket Ground | T20 | 125 | 166 | 12 | 8.0 | 13.8 | LOW |
| Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County | T20 | 120 | 151 | 8 | 7.5 | 18.9 | LOW |
| Simar Cricket Ground, Rome | T20 | 66 | 54 | 4 | 4.9 | 13.5 | LOW |
| Dreux Sport Cricket Club | T20 | 60 | 74 | 4 | 7.4 | 18.5 | LOW |
| Happy Valley Ground | T20 | 53 | 77 | 3 | 8.7 | 25.7 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 29 | 462 | 394 | 22.0 | 117.3 | 14.0 | 37.6 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 619 | 740 | 53 | 7.2 | 14.0 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 20 | 204 | 202 | 29.1 | 101.0 | 10.4 | 41.1 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 22 | 228 | 167 | 16.3 | 136.5 | 18.0 | 31.1 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 300 | 329 | 18 | 6.6 | 18.3 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 265 | 359 | 31 | 8.1 | 11.6 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 54 | 52 | 4 | 5.8 | 13.0 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 26 | 296 | 232 | 21.1 | 127.6 | 15.9 | 35.3 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 20 | 132 | 127 | 26.4 | 103.9 | 12.6 | 41.7 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 8 | 34 | 35 | 17.0 | 97.1 | 5.7 | 37.1 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.