V Ravindran betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 30 | 810 | 545 | 27.9 | 148.6 | 23.9 | 41.5 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 71 | 110 | 4 | 9.3 | 27.5 | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where V Ravindran scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)HIGH sample
597 runs off 368 balls in 30 T20 matches — strike rate 162.2 vs 148.6 overall, average 37.3 vs 27.9 overall.
- Venue: GB Oval, Szodliget (T20)MEDIUM sample
399 runs off 247 balls in 11 T20 matches — strike rate 161.5 vs 148.6 overall, average 39.9 vs 27.9 overall.
- Opposition: Austria (T20)LOW sample
152 runs off 96 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 158.3 vs 148.6 overall, average 25.3 vs 27.9 overall.
- Opposition: Slovenia (T20)LOW sample
157 runs off 83 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 189.2 vs 148.6 overall, average 78.5 vs 27.9 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)LOW sample
172 runs off 101 balls in 13 T20 matches — strike rate 170.3 vs 148.6 overall, average 86.0 vs 27.9 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
213 runs off 176 balls in 14 T20 matches — strike rate 121.0 vs 148.6 overall, average 17.8 vs 27.9 overall.
- Opposition: Luxembourg (T20)LOW sample
93 runs off 77 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 120.8 vs 148.6 overall, average 46.5 vs 27.9 overall.
- Venue: Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County (T20)LOW sample
130 runs off 95 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 136.8 vs 148.6 overall, average 18.6 vs 27.9 overall.
- Venue: Simar Cricket Ground, Rome (T20)LOW sample
91 runs off 69 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 131.9 vs 148.6 overall, average 30.3 vs 27.9 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)LOW sample
126 runs off 100 balls in 12 T20 matches — strike rate 126.0 vs 148.6 overall, average 14.0 vs 27.9 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Austria | T20 | 6 | 152 | 96 | 25.3 | 158.3 | 28.1 | 44.8 | LOW |
| Slovenia | T20 | 3 | 157 | 83 | 78.5 | 189.2 | 31.3 | 31.3 | LOW |
| Luxembourg | T20 | 2 | 93 | 77 | 46.5 | 120.8 | 15.6 | 44.2 | LOW |
| Romania | T20 | 4 | 70 | 57 | 17.5 | 122.8 | 17.5 | 54.4 | LOW |
| Portugal | T20 | 1 | 57 | 45 | 57.0 | 126.7 | 17.8 | 28.9 | LOW |
| Czech Republic | T20 | 2 | 46 | 33 | 23.0 | 139.4 | 27.3 | 42.4 | LOW |
| Estonia | T20 | 1 | 46 | 32 | 46.0 | 143.8 | 21.9 | 40.6 | LOW |
| Belgium | T20 | 3 | 49 | 30 | 16.3 | 163.3 | 30.0 | 46.7 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| GB Oval, Szodliget | T20 | 11 | 399 | 247 | 39.9 | 161.5 | 25.5 | 38.1 | MEDIUM |
| Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County | T20 | 7 | 130 | 95 | 18.6 | 136.8 | 22.1 | 48.4 | LOW |
| Simar Cricket Ground, Rome | T20 | 3 | 91 | 69 | 30.3 | 131.9 | 20.3 | 36.2 | LOW |
| Scott Page Field, Vinor | T20 | 2 | 46 | 33 | 23.0 | 139.4 | 27.3 | 42.4 | LOW |
| Koge Cricket Club | T20 | 1 | 46 | 32 | 46.0 | 143.8 | 21.9 | 40.6 | LOW |
| Svanholm Park, Brondby | T20 | 3 | 41 | 32 | 13.7 | 128.1 | 25.0 | 59.4 | LOW |
Bowling
| GB Oval, Szodliget | T20 | 52 | 68 | 4 | 7.8 | 17.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 30 | 810 | 545 | 27.9 | 148.6 | 23.9 | 41.5 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 71 | 110 | 4 | 9.3 | 27.5 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 30 | 597 | 368 | 37.3 | 162.2 | 28.3 | 43.5 | HIGH |
| middle | T20 | 14 | 213 | 176 | 17.8 | 121.0 | 14.8 | 36.9 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 66 | 105 | 2 | 9.5 | 52.5 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 29 | 512 | 344 | 28.4 | 148.8 | 23.8 | 43.9 | HIGH |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 13 | 172 | 101 | 86.0 | 170.3 | 29.7 | 35.6 | LOW |
| SPIN | T20 | 12 | 126 | 100 | 14.0 | 126.0 | 18.0 | 39.0 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.