V Saini betting stats, splits & projections
All-rounder
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 50 | 1359 | 1052 | 36.7 | 129.2 | 15.1 | 29.8 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 894 | 1116 | 42 | 7.5 | 26.6 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where V Saini scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)HIGH sample
539 runs off 426 balls in 35 T20 matches — strike rate 126.5 vs 129.2 overall, average 59.9 vs 36.7 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)HIGH sample
822 runs off 656 balls in 41 T20 matches — strike rate 125.3 vs 129.2 overall, average 48.4 vs 36.7 overall.
- Opposition: Malta (T20)MEDIUM sample
229 runs off 165 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 138.8 vs 129.2 overall, average 45.8 vs 36.7 overall.
- Opposition: Luxembourg (T20)MEDIUM sample
201 runs off 129 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 155.8 vs 129.2 overall, average 100.5 vs 36.7 overall.
- Venue: Marsa Sports Club (T20)MEDIUM sample
325 runs off 233 balls in 11 T20 matches — strike rate 139.5 vs 129.2 overall, average 46.4 vs 36.7 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)MEDIUM sample
244 runs off 165 balls in 21 T20 matches — strike rate 147.9 vs 129.2 overall, average 30.5 vs 36.7 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)MEDIUM sample
205 runs off 189 balls in 29 T20 matches — strike rate 108.5 vs 129.2 overall, average 29.3 vs 36.7 overall.
- Opposition: Czech Republic (T20)LOW sample
136 runs off 114 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 119.3 vs 129.2 overall, average 34.0 vs 36.7 overall.
- Opposition: Belgium (T20)LOW sample
82 runs off 74 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 110.8 vs 129.2 overall, average 27.3 vs 36.7 overall.
- Opposition: Austria (T20)LOW sample
90 runs off 67 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 134.3 vs 129.2 overall, average 22.5 vs 36.7 overall.
- Opposition: Switzerland (T20)LOW sample
71 runs off 62 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 114.5 vs 129.2 overall, average 35.5 vs 36.7 overall.
- Venue: Simar Cricket Ground, Rome (T20)LOW sample
88 runs off 74 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 118.9 vs 129.2 overall, average 29.3 vs 36.7 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Malta | T20 | 9 | 229 | 165 | 45.8 | 138.8 | 17.0 | 30.3 | MEDIUM |
| Luxembourg | T20 | 3 | 201 | 129 | 100.5 | 155.8 | 20.2 | 24.0 | MEDIUM |
| Bulgaria | T20 | 5 | 175 | 114 | 43.8 | 153.5 | 20.2 | 17.5 | LOW |
| Czech Republic | T20 | 5 | 136 | 114 | 34.0 | 119.3 | 10.5 | 27.2 | LOW |
| Hungary | T20 | 4 | 129 | 82 | 129.0 | 157.3 | 22.0 | 19.5 | LOW |
| Belgium | T20 | 3 | 82 | 74 | 27.3 | 110.8 | 13.5 | 40.5 | LOW |
| Austria | T20 | 4 | 90 | 67 | 22.5 | 134.3 | 14.9 | 32.8 | LOW |
| Switzerland | T20 | 2 | 71 | 62 | 35.5 | 114.5 | 11.3 | 29.0 | LOW |
| France | T20 | 3 | 56 | 50 | 56.0 | 112.0 | 12.0 | 34.0 | LOW |
| Turkey | T20 | 1 | 52 | 44 | — | 118.2 | 13.6 | 31.8 | LOW |
Bowling
| Malta | T20 | 198 | 258 | 9 | 7.8 | 28.7 | MEDIUM |
| Czech Republic | T20 | 84 | 104 | 4 | 7.4 | 26.0 | LOW |
| Hungary | T20 | 71 | 67 | 6 | 5.7 | 11.2 | LOW |
| Austria | T20 | 66 | 103 | 3 | 9.4 | 34.3 | LOW |
| Belgium | T20 | 66 | 95 | 2 | 8.6 | 47.5 | LOW |
| Bulgaria | T20 | 60 | 62 | 4 | 6.2 | 15.5 | LOW |
| Luxembourg | T20 | 53 | 61 | 6 | 6.9 | 10.2 | LOW |
| Gibraltar | T20 | 48 | 44 | 2 | 5.5 | 22.0 | LOW |
| Serbia | T20 | 48 | 47 | 1 | 5.9 | 47.0 | LOW |
| France | T20 | 42 | 72 | 1 | 10.3 | 72.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County | T20 | 24 | 688 | 504 | 40.5 | 136.5 | 16.5 | 26.6 | HIGH |
| Marsa Sports Club | T20 | 11 | 325 | 233 | 46.4 | 139.5 | 16.3 | 27.9 | MEDIUM |
| Simar Cricket Ground, Rome | T20 | 3 | 88 | 74 | 29.3 | 118.9 | 10.8 | 33.8 | LOW |
| Kerava National Cricket Ground | T20 | 2 | 83 | 70 | 83.0 | 118.6 | 12.9 | 30.0 | LOW |
| GB Oval, Szodliget | T20 | 2 | 64 | 48 | 32.0 | 133.3 | 18.8 | 31.3 | LOW |
| Tikkurila Cricket Ground | T20 | 3 | 31 | 44 | 10.3 | 70.5 | 4.5 | 52.3 | LOW |
| Svanholm Park, Brondby | T20 | 2 | 40 | 37 | 20.0 | 108.1 | 13.5 | 37.8 | LOW |
| Koge Cricket Club | T20 | 1 | 37 | 36 | 37.0 | 102.8 | 13.9 | 38.9 | LOW |
Bowling
| Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County | T20 | 392 | 528 | 18 | 8.1 | 29.3 | HIGH |
| Marsa Sports Club | T20 | 213 | 277 | 8 | 7.8 | 34.6 | MEDIUM |
| Simar Cricket Ground, Rome | T20 | 66 | 105 | 3 | 9.5 | 35.0 | LOW |
| Koge Cricket Club | T20 | 48 | 43 | 1 | 5.4 | 43.0 | LOW |
| GB Oval, Szodliget | T20 | 47 | 48 | 6 | 6.1 | 8.0 | LOW |
| Roma Cricket Ground | T20 | 44 | 22 | 3 | 3.0 | 7.3 | LOW |
| Tikkurila Cricket Ground | T20 | 42 | 50 | 0 | 7.1 | — | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 50 | 1359 | 1052 | 36.7 | 129.2 | 15.1 | 29.8 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 894 | 1116 | 42 | 7.5 | 26.6 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 41 | 822 | 656 | 48.4 | 125.3 | 13.4 | 28.7 | HIGH |
| death | T20 | 22 | 332 | 207 | 25.5 | 160.4 | 21.7 | 22.7 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 29 | 205 | 189 | 29.3 | 108.5 | 13.8 | 41.8 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 540 | 673 | 23 | 7.5 | 29.3 | HIGH |
| death | T20 | 180 | 231 | 15 | 7.7 | 15.4 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 174 | 212 | 4 | 7.3 | 53.0 | MEDIUM |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 41 | 576 | 461 | 28.8 | 124.9 | 15.4 | 31.5 | HIGH |
| SPIN | T20 | 35 | 539 | 426 | 59.9 | 126.5 | 13.1 | 29.1 | HIGH |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 21 | 244 | 165 | 30.5 | 147.9 | 19.4 | 27.3 | MEDIUM |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.