V Stolle betting stats, splits & projections
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 10 | 59 | 93 | 7.4 | 63.4 | 1.1 | 49.5 | LOW |
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Denmark | T20 | 3 | 37 | 48 | 18.5 | 77.1 | 0.0 | 37.5 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Hazelaarweg, Rotterdam | T20 | 4 | 16 | 38 | 5.3 | 42.1 | 2.6 | 68.4 | LOW |
| GelsenTrabPark, Gelsenkirchen | T20 | 2 | 25 | 31 | 25.0 | 80.6 | 0.0 | 32.3 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 10 | 59 | 93 | 7.4 | 63.4 | 1.1 | 49.5 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| death | T20 | 7 | 40 | 50 | 8.0 | 80.0 | 2.0 | 38.0 | LOW |
| middle | T20 | 6 | 19 | 43 | 6.3 | 44.2 | 0.0 | 62.8 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 8 | 26 | 39 | 4.3 | 66.7 | 0.0 | 43.6 | LOW |
| SPIN | T20 | 5 | 10 | 32 | 5.0 | 31.3 | 0.0 | 68.8 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.