VE Tembo betting stats, splits & projections
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 16 | 208 | 169 | 16.0 | 123.1 | 18.9 | 49.7 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 36 | 83 | 1 | 13.8 | 83.0 | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where VE Tembo scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Eswatini (T20)LOW sample
111 runs off 64 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 173.4 vs 123.1 overall, average 27.8 vs 16.0 overall.
- Venue: Malkerns Country Club oval (T20)LOW sample
125 runs off 78 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 160.3 vs 123.1 overall, average 20.8 vs 16.0 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: middle (T20)LOW sample
82 runs off 76 balls in 10 T20 matches — strike rate 107.9 vs 123.1 overall, average 11.7 vs 16.0 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)LOW sample
50 runs off 60 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 83.3 vs 123.1 overall, average 12.5 vs 16.0 overall.
Current projections
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Eswatini | T20 | 7 | 111 | 64 | 27.8 | 173.4 | 32.8 | 39.1 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Malkerns Country Club oval | T20 | 9 | 125 | 78 | 20.8 | 160.3 | 28.2 | 38.5 | LOW |
| Gymkhana Club Ground, Nairobi | T20 | 3 | 51 | 44 | 17.0 | 115.9 | 13.6 | 52.3 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 16 | 208 | 169 | 16.0 | 123.1 | 18.9 | 49.7 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 36 | 83 | 1 | 13.8 | 83.0 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 10 | 82 | 76 | 11.7 | 107.9 | 13.2 | 52.6 | LOW |
| powerplay | T20 | 9 | 50 | 60 | 12.5 | 83.3 | 11.7 | 65.0 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 4 | 76 | 33 | 38.0 | 230.3 | 45.5 | 15.2 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 14 | 112 | 93 | 16.0 | 120.4 | 19.4 | 51.6 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 9 | 58 | 44 | 19.3 | 131.8 | 18.2 | 45.5 | LOW |
| SPIN | T20 | 6 | 38 | 32 | 12.7 | 118.8 | 18.8 | 50.0 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.