W Boshoff betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 24 | 549 | 471 | 32.3 | 116.6 | 12.1 | 38.6 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where W Boshoff scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Venue: Botkyrka Cricket Center, Stockholm (T20)MEDIUM sample
186 runs off 125 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 148.8 vs 116.6 overall, average 46.5 vs 32.3 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)MEDIUM sample
282 runs off 266 balls in 21 T20 matches — strike rate 106.0 vs 116.6 overall, average 56.4 vs 32.3 overall.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
208 runs off 155 balls in 20 T20 matches — strike rate 134.2 vs 116.6 overall, average 26.0 vs 32.3 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)LOW sample
170 runs off 112 balls in 13 T20 matches — strike rate 151.8 vs 116.6 overall, average 28.3 vs 32.3 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Opposition: Austria (T20)LOW sample
119 runs off 112 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 106.3 vs 116.6 overall, average 29.8 vs 32.3 overall.
- Venue: Bayer Uerdingen Cricket Ground (T20)LOW sample
69 runs off 77 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 89.6 vs 116.6 overall, average 23.0 vs 32.3 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)LOW sample
67 runs off 78 balls in 10 T20 matches — strike rate 85.9 vs 116.6 overall, average 33.5 vs 32.3 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Indonesia | T20 | 7 | 139 | 122 | 46.3 | 113.9 | 9.0 | 32.8 | MEDIUM |
| Austria | T20 | 4 | 119 | 112 | 29.8 | 106.3 | 10.7 | 39.3 | LOW |
| Portugal | T20 | 3 | 104 | 57 | 52.0 | 182.5 | 24.6 | 22.8 | LOW |
| Norway | T20 | 1 | 46 | 38 | — | 121.1 | 15.8 | 39.5 | LOW |
| Finland | T20 | 3 | 25 | 37 | 8.3 | 67.6 | 2.7 | 56.8 | LOW |
| France | T20 | 1 | 56 | 35 | — | 160.0 | 17.1 | 25.7 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Botkyrka Cricket Center, Stockholm | T20 | 6 | 186 | 125 | 46.5 | 148.8 | 19.2 | 32.0 | MEDIUM |
| Udayana Cricket Ground | T20 | 7 | 139 | 122 | 46.3 | 113.9 | 9.0 | 32.8 | MEDIUM |
| Happy Valley Ground 2 | T20 | 3 | 92 | 84 | 46.0 | 109.5 | 10.7 | 41.7 | LOW |
| Bayer Uerdingen Cricket Ground | T20 | 3 | 69 | 77 | 23.0 | 89.6 | 7.8 | 46.8 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 24 | 549 | 471 | 32.3 | 116.6 | 12.1 | 38.6 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 21 | 312 | 281 | 34.7 | 111.0 | 10.7 | 38.8 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 13 | 170 | 112 | 28.3 | 151.8 | 18.8 | 29.5 | LOW |
| powerplay | T20 | 10 | 67 | 78 | 33.5 | 85.9 | 7.7 | 51.3 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 21 | 282 | 266 | 56.4 | 106.0 | 9.4 | 39.5 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | T20 | 20 | 208 | 155 | 26.0 | 134.2 | 16.1 | 36.8 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 11 | 59 | 50 | 14.8 | 118.0 | 14.0 | 40.0 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.