Walid Ghauri betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 30 | 832 | 678 | 30.8 | 122.7 | 15.0 | 38.3 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 60 | 84 | 2 | 8.4 | 42.0 | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where Walid Ghauri scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Phase: middle (T20)HIGH sample
424 runs off 309 balls in 19 T20 matches — strike rate 137.2 vs 122.7 overall, average 35.3 vs 30.8 overall.
- Opposition: Sweden (T20)MEDIUM sample
231 runs off 178 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 129.8 vs 122.7 overall, average 57.8 vs 30.8 overall.
- Venue: Scott Page Field, Vinor (T20)MEDIUM sample
164 runs off 124 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 132.3 vs 122.7 overall, average 41.0 vs 30.8 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)MEDIUM sample
243 runs off 199 balls in 22 T20 matches — strike rate 122.1 vs 122.7 overall, average 48.6 vs 30.8 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)MEDIUM sample
189 runs off 128 balls in 14 T20 matches — strike rate 147.7 vs 122.7 overall, average 47.3 vs 30.8 overall.
- Venue: Koge Cricket Club (T20)LOW sample
197 runs off 100 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 197.0 vs 122.7 overall, average 98.5 vs 30.8 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)HIGH sample
400 runs off 351 balls in 28 T20 matches — strike rate 114.0 vs 122.7 overall, average 22.2 vs 30.8 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)HIGH sample
324 runs off 315 balls in 27 T20 matches — strike rate 102.9 vs 122.7 overall, average 29.5 vs 30.8 overall.
- Venue: Botkyrka Cricket Center, Stockholm (T20)MEDIUM sample
117 runs off 120 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 97.5 vs 122.7 overall, average 19.5 vs 30.8 overall.
- Opposition: Austria (T20)LOW sample
104 runs off 107 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 97.2 vs 122.7 overall, average 20.8 vs 30.8 overall.
- Opposition: Finland (T20)LOW sample
73 runs off 66 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 110.6 vs 122.7 overall, average 14.6 vs 30.8 overall.
- Venue: Desert Springs Cricket Ground, Almeria (T20)LOW sample
67 runs off 85 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 78.8 vs 122.7 overall, average 22.3 vs 30.8 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Sweden | T20 | 5 | 231 | 178 | 57.8 | 129.8 | 15.2 | 32.0 | MEDIUM |
| Austria | T20 | 5 | 104 | 107 | 20.8 | 97.2 | 11.2 | 48.6 | LOW |
| Finland | T20 | 5 | 73 | 66 | 14.6 | 110.6 | 12.1 | 42.4 | LOW |
| Guernsey | T20 | 2 | 44 | 58 | 22.0 | 75.9 | 8.6 | 51.7 | LOW |
| Czech Republic | T20 | 2 | 79 | 55 | 39.5 | 143.6 | 20.0 | 32.7 | LOW |
| Denmark | T20 | 2 | 107 | 55 | 107.0 | 194.5 | 32.7 | 29.1 | LOW |
| Germany | T20 | 1 | 33 | 32 | 33.0 | 103.1 | 12.5 | 43.8 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Scott Page Field, Vinor | T20 | 4 | 164 | 124 | 41.0 | 132.3 | 17.7 | 34.7 | MEDIUM |
| Botkyrka Cricket Center, Stockholm | T20 | 7 | 117 | 120 | 19.5 | 97.5 | 11.7 | 50.0 | MEDIUM |
| Koge Cricket Club | T20 | 4 | 197 | 100 | 98.5 | 197.0 | 29.0 | 24.0 | LOW |
| Bayer Uerdingen Cricket Ground | T20 | 4 | 116 | 93 | 29.0 | 124.7 | 15.1 | 34.4 | LOW |
| Desert Springs Cricket Ground, Almeria | T20 | 3 | 67 | 85 | 22.3 | 78.8 | 8.2 | 51.8 | LOW |
| Stubberudmyra Cricket Ground, Oslo | T20 | 2 | 62 | 59 | 31.0 | 105.1 | 6.8 | 33.9 | LOW |
| Kerava National Cricket Ground | T20 | 2 | 65 | 58 | 32.5 | 112.1 | 12.1 | 41.4 | LOW |
| Ishoj Cricket Club, Vejledalen | T20 | 3 | 37 | 32 | 12.3 | 115.6 | 12.5 | 31.3 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 30 | 832 | 678 | 30.8 | 122.7 | 15.0 | 38.3 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 60 | 84 | 2 | 8.4 | 42.0 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 27 | 324 | 315 | 29.5 | 102.9 | 12.7 | 47.3 | HIGH |
| middle | T20 | 19 | 424 | 309 | 35.3 | 137.2 | 16.2 | 31.1 | HIGH |
| death | T20 | 7 | 84 | 54 | 21.0 | 155.6 | 22.2 | 27.8 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 42 | 54 | 0 | 7.7 | — | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 28 | 400 | 351 | 22.2 | 114.0 | 14.8 | 41.9 | HIGH |
| SPIN | T20 | 22 | 243 | 199 | 48.6 | 122.1 | 11.6 | 33.7 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 14 | 189 | 128 | 47.3 | 147.7 | 21.1 | 35.9 | MEDIUM |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.