Waqar Ali betting stats, splits & projections
Bowler
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2.0 | 50.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | LOW |
| overall | T20 | 318 | 285 | 27 | 5.4 | 10.6 | MEDIUM |
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
Bowling
| Croatia | T20 | 116 | 103 | 10 | 5.3 | 10.3 | LOW |
| Bulgaria | T20 | 88 | 64 | 10 | 4.4 | 6.4 | LOW |
| Serbia | T20 | 48 | 31 | 4 | 3.9 | 7.8 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
Bowling
| Happy Valley Ground 2 | T20 | 160 | 147 | 13 | 5.5 | 11.3 | MEDIUM |
| Mladost Cricket Ground, Zagreb | T20 | 92 | 81 | 8 | 5.3 | 10.1 | LOW |
| Happy Valley Ground | T20 | 66 | 57 | 6 | 5.2 | 9.5 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 318 | 285 | 27 | 5.4 | 10.6 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
Bowling
| powerplay | T20 | 132 | 111 | 8 | 5.0 | 13.9 | LOW |
| middle | T20 | 96 | 100 | 7 | 6.3 | 14.3 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 90 | 74 | 12 | 4.9 | 6.2 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.