Y Jalloh betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 23 | 284 | 323 | 14.2 | 87.9 | 8.4 | 45.5 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where Y Jalloh scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Zambia (T20)LOW sample
117 runs off 107 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 109.3 vs 87.9 overall, average 39.0 vs 14.2 overall.
- Opposition: Ivory Coast (T20)LOW sample
77 runs off 63 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 122.2 vs 87.9 overall, not yet dismissed vs 14.2 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)LOW sample
69 runs off 71 balls in 10 T20 matches — strike rate 97.2 vs 87.9 overall, average 23.0 vs 14.2 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)LOW sample
63 runs off 61 balls in 10 T20 matches — strike rate 103.3 vs 87.9 overall, average 15.8 vs 14.2 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)LOW sample
111 runs off 103 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 107.8 vs 87.9 overall, average 22.2 vs 14.2 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
152 runs off 191 balls in 22 T20 matches — strike rate 79.6 vs 87.9 overall, average 11.7 vs 14.2 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)MEDIUM sample
149 runs off 201 balls in 21 T20 matches — strike rate 74.1 vs 87.9 overall, average 11.5 vs 14.2 overall.
- Opposition: Rwanda (T20)LOW sample
39 runs off 64 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 60.9 vs 87.9 overall, average 9.8 vs 14.2 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Zambia | T20 | 3 | 117 | 107 | 39.0 | 109.3 | 10.3 | 33.6 | LOW |
| Rwanda | T20 | 4 | 39 | 64 | 9.8 | 60.9 | 6.3 | 56.3 | LOW |
| Ivory Coast | T20 | 2 | 77 | 63 | — | 122.2 | 9.5 | 27.0 | LOW |
| Nigeria | T20 | 6 | 28 | 50 | 5.6 | 56.0 | 6.0 | 60.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Nigeria Cricket Federation Oval 1, Abuja | T20 | 10 | 172 | 193 | 17.2 | 89.1 | 8.8 | 44.0 | MEDIUM |
| Tafawa Balewa Square Cricket Oval, Lagos | T20 | 4 | 59 | 69 | 29.5 | 85.5 | 4.3 | 39.1 | LOW |
| Botswana Cricket Association Oval 2, Gaborone | T20 | 3 | 40 | 38 | 20.0 | 105.3 | 13.2 | 44.7 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 23 | 284 | 323 | 14.2 | 87.9 | 8.4 | 45.5 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 21 | 149 | 201 | 11.5 | 74.1 | 8.0 | 53.7 | MEDIUM |
| middle | T20 | 9 | 111 | 103 | 22.2 | 107.8 | 8.7 | 33.0 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 22 | 152 | 191 | 11.7 | 79.6 | 8.4 | 50.3 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 10 | 69 | 71 | 23.0 | 97.2 | 7.0 | 38.0 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 10 | 63 | 61 | 15.8 | 103.3 | 9.8 | 39.3 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.