Yasir Ali betting stats, splits & projections
All-rounder
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 28 | 540 | 538 | 22.5 | 100.4 | 10.0 | 40.7 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 549 | 499 | 45 | 5.5 | 11.1 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where Yasir Ali scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)MEDIUM sample
250 runs off 208 balls in 19 T20 matches — strike rate 120.2 vs 100.4 overall, average 41.7 vs 22.5 overall.
- Opposition: Croatia (T20)LOW sample
107 runs off 97 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 110.3 vs 100.4 overall, average 17.8 vs 22.5 overall.
- Opposition: Finland (T20)LOW sample
92 runs off 76 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 121.1 vs 100.4 overall, average 92.0 vs 22.5 overall.
- Venue: Tikkurila Cricket Ground (T20)LOW sample
83 runs off 71 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 116.9 vs 100.4 overall, average 41.5 vs 22.5 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
194 runs off 222 balls in 25 T20 matches — strike rate 87.4 vs 100.4 overall, average 24.3 vs 22.5 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)MEDIUM sample
158 runs off 180 balls in 23 T20 matches — strike rate 87.8 vs 100.4 overall, average 26.3 vs 22.5 overall.
- Venue: La Manga Club Top Ground (T20)LOW sample
63 runs off 63 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 100.0 vs 100.4 overall, average 12.6 vs 22.5 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)LOW sample
96 runs off 108 balls in 13 T20 matches — strike rate 88.9 vs 100.4 overall, average 9.6 vs 22.5 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Croatia | T20 | 7 | 107 | 97 | 17.8 | 110.3 | 11.3 | 39.2 | LOW |
| Finland | T20 | 2 | 92 | 76 | 92.0 | 121.1 | 11.8 | 30.3 | LOW |
| Norway | T20 | 2 | 62 | 64 | 31.0 | 96.9 | 6.3 | 32.8 | LOW |
| Luxembourg | T20 | 1 | 64 | 45 | 64.0 | 142.2 | 17.8 | 31.1 | LOW |
| Italy | T20 | 2 | 46 | 44 | 23.0 | 104.5 | 9.1 | 31.8 | LOW |
| Greece | T20 | 1 | 25 | 30 | — | 83.3 | 10.0 | 46.7 | LOW |
Bowling
| Croatia | T20 | 124 | 81 | 15 | 3.9 | 5.4 | LOW |
| Finland | T20 | 48 | 55 | 2 | 6.9 | 27.5 | LOW |
| Germany | T20 | 48 | 55 | 2 | 6.9 | 27.5 | LOW |
| Italy | T20 | 48 | 37 | 2 | 4.6 | 18.5 | LOW |
| Portugal | T20 | 48 | 32 | 5 | 4.0 | 6.4 | LOW |
| Guernsey | T20 | 36 | 23 | 2 | 3.8 | 11.5 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Desert Springs Cricket Ground, Almeria | T20 | 8 | 135 | 140 | 19.3 | 96.4 | 7.9 | 37.9 | MEDIUM |
| Tikkurila Cricket Ground | T20 | 2 | 83 | 71 | 41.5 | 116.9 | 14.1 | 38.0 | LOW |
| Kerava National Cricket Ground | T20 | 2 | 67 | 66 | 67.0 | 101.5 | 7.6 | 37.9 | LOW |
| King George V Sports Ground, Castel | T20 | 2 | 64 | 63 | 32.0 | 101.6 | 12.7 | 42.9 | LOW |
| La Manga Club Top Ground | T20 | 5 | 63 | 63 | 12.6 | 100.0 | 7.9 | 39.7 | LOW |
| Mladost Cricket Ground, Zagreb | T20 | 4 | 59 | 57 | 19.7 | 103.5 | 12.3 | 43.9 | LOW |
| Guernsey Rovers Athletic Club Ground, Port Soif | T20 | 2 | 27 | 39 | 27.0 | 69.2 | 7.7 | 53.8 | LOW |
Bowling
| Desert Springs Cricket Ground, Almeria | T20 | 167 | 145 | 11 | 5.2 | 13.2 | MEDIUM |
| La Manga Club Top Ground | T20 | 120 | 95 | 7 | 4.8 | 13.6 | LOW |
| Guernsey Rovers Athletic Club Ground, Port Soif | T20 | 48 | 34 | 5 | 4.3 | 6.8 | LOW |
| Kerava National Cricket Ground | T20 | 48 | 52 | 3 | 6.5 | 17.3 | LOW |
| King George V Sports Ground, Castel | T20 | 42 | 49 | 4 | 7.0 | 12.3 | LOW |
| Meersen, Gent | T20 | 36 | 20 | 5 | 3.3 | 4.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 28 | 540 | 538 | 22.5 | 100.4 | 10.0 | 40.7 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 549 | 499 | 45 | 5.5 | 11.1 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 22 | 337 | 324 | 25.9 | 104.0 | 8.6 | 34.9 | HIGH |
| powerplay | T20 | 23 | 158 | 180 | 26.3 | 87.8 | 11.7 | 53.3 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 6 | 45 | 34 | 9.0 | 132.4 | 14.7 | 29.4 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 192 | 155 | 19 | 4.8 | 8.2 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 183 | 194 | 19 | 6.4 | 10.2 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 174 | 150 | 7 | 5.2 | 21.4 | MEDIUM |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 25 | 194 | 222 | 24.3 | 87.4 | 7.7 | 45.9 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 19 | 250 | 208 | 41.7 | 120.2 | 14.4 | 34.1 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 13 | 96 | 108 | 9.6 | 88.9 | 6.5 | 42.6 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.