YS Blagg betting stats, splits & projections
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 6 | 30 | 31 | 15.0 | 96.8 | 6.5 | 41.9 | LOW |
| overall | T20 | 184 | 151 | 17 | 4.9 | 8.9 | MEDIUM |
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
Bowling
| Czech Republic | T20 | 61 | 44 | 9 | 4.3 | 4.9 | LOW |
| Croatia | T20 | 48 | 34 | 2 | 4.3 | 17.0 | LOW |
| Estonia | T20 | 42 | 16 | 4 | 2.3 | 4.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
Bowling
| Scott Page Field, Vinor | T20 | 121 | 98 | 11 | 4.9 | 8.9 | LOW |
| Europa Sports Complex | T20 | 63 | 53 | 6 | 5.0 | 8.8 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 6 | 30 | 31 | 15.0 | 96.8 | 6.5 | 41.9 | LOW |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 184 | 151 | 17 | 4.9 | 8.9 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| death | T20 | 6 | 30 | 31 | 15.0 | 96.8 | 6.5 | 41.9 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 141 | 117 | 10 | 5.0 | 11.7 | LOW |
| powerplay | T20 | 36 | 26 | 6 | 4.3 | 4.3 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.