YS Samra betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 17 | 524 | 328 | 37.4 | 159.8 | 23.8 | 36.0 | HIGH |
| overall | ODI | 5 | 142 | 218 | 35.5 | 65.1 | 8.7 | 67.4 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 12 | 13 | 2 | 6.5 | 6.5 | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where YS Samra scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
322 runs off 200 balls in 17 T20 matches — strike rate 161.0 vs 159.8 overall, average 80.5 vs 37.4 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)MEDIUM sample
327 runs off 193 balls in 16 T20 matches — strike rate 169.4 vs 159.8 overall, average 54.5 vs 37.4 overall.
- Opposition: New Zealand (T20)LOW sample
110 runs off 65 balls in 1 T20 match — strike rate 169.2 vs 159.8 overall, average 110.0 vs 37.4 overall.
- Opposition: Cayman Islands (T20)LOW sample
114 runs off 64 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 178.1 vs 159.8 overall, average 57.0 vs 37.4 overall.
- Venue: Maple Leaf North-West Ground, King City (T20)LOW sample
171 runs off 79 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 216.5 vs 159.8 overall, average 57.0 vs 37.4 overall.
- Venue: MA Chidambaram Stadium, Chepauk, Chennai (T20)LOW sample
110 runs off 65 balls in 1 T20 match — strike rate 169.2 vs 159.8 overall, average 110.0 vs 37.4 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: powerplay (ODI)MEDIUM sample
73 runs off 134 balls in 5 ODI matches — strike rate 54.5 vs 65.1 overall, not yet dismissed vs 35.5 overall.
- Venue: Jimmy Powell Oval, Cayman Islands (T20)LOW sample
74 runs off 63 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 117.5 vs 159.8 overall, average 24.7 vs 37.4 overall.
- Bowling type: PACE (ODI)LOW sample
36 runs off 82 balls in 4 ODI matches — strike rate 43.9 vs 65.1 overall, average 36.0 vs 35.5 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)LOW sample
170 runs off 119 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 142.9 vs 159.8 overall, average 24.3 vs 37.4 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Namibia | ODI | 2 | 77 | 117 | 38.5 | 65.8 | 9.4 | 70.9 | LOW |
| New Zealand | T20 | 1 | 110 | 65 | 110.0 | 169.2 | 26.2 | 30.8 | LOW |
| Cayman Islands | T20 | 3 | 114 | 64 | 57.0 | 178.1 | 28.1 | 37.5 | LOW |
| Namibia | T20 | 3 | 57 | 53 | 19.0 | 107.5 | 13.2 | 47.2 | LOW |
| Oman | ODI | 2 | 24 | 51 | 24.0 | 47.1 | 3.9 | 68.6 | LOW |
| United States of America | ODI | 1 | 41 | 50 | 41.0 | 82.0 | 12.0 | 58.0 | LOW |
| Bermuda | T20 | 2 | 74 | 48 | 37.0 | 154.2 | 18.8 | 31.3 | LOW |
| Bahamas | T20 | 4 | 101 | 44 | 50.5 | 229.5 | 36.4 | 20.5 | LOW |
| United States of America | T20 | 2 | 51 | 41 | 25.5 | 124.4 | 19.5 | 46.3 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Wanderers Cricket Ground, Windhoek | ODI | 2 | 77 | 117 | 38.5 | 65.8 | 9.4 | 70.9 | LOW |
| Central Broward Regional Park Stadium Turf Ground, Lauderhill | ODI | 3 | 65 | 101 | 32.5 | 64.4 | 7.9 | 63.4 | LOW |
| Maple Leaf North-West Ground, King City | T20 | 5 | 171 | 79 | 57.0 | 216.5 | 32.9 | 24.1 | LOW |
| MA Chidambaram Stadium, Chepauk, Chennai | T20 | 1 | 110 | 65 | 110.0 | 169.2 | 26.2 | 30.8 | LOW |
| Jimmy Powell Oval, Cayman Islands | T20 | 4 | 74 | 63 | 24.7 | 117.5 | 15.9 | 39.7 | LOW |
| Maple Leaf North-East Ground, King City | T20 | 2 | 95 | 55 | 47.5 | 172.7 | 27.3 | 41.8 | LOW |
| Namibia Cricket Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 3 | 57 | 53 | 19.0 | 107.5 | 13.2 | 47.2 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 17 | 524 | 328 | 37.4 | 159.8 | 23.8 | 36.0 | HIGH |
| Unknown | ODI | 5 | 142 | 218 | 35.5 | 65.1 | 8.7 | 67.4 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 16 | 327 | 193 | 54.5 | 169.4 | 28.5 | 38.9 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | ODI | 5 | 73 | 134 | — | 54.5 | 7.5 | 72.4 | MEDIUM |
| middle | T20 | 8 | 170 | 119 | 24.3 | 142.9 | 16.0 | 31.9 | LOW |
| middle | ODI | 4 | 69 | 84 | 17.3 | 82.1 | 10.7 | 59.5 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 17 | 322 | 200 | 80.5 | 161.0 | 25.5 | 37.5 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 14 | 167 | 97 | 23.9 | 172.2 | 23.7 | 30.9 | LOW |
| PACE | ODI | 4 | 36 | 82 | 36.0 | 43.9 | 6.1 | 75.6 | LOW |
| SPIN | ODI | 4 | 55 | 74 | 27.5 | 74.3 | 9.5 | 64.9 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | ODI | 4 | 51 | 62 | 51.0 | 82.3 | 11.3 | 59.7 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 6 | 35 | 31 | 11.7 | 112.9 | 12.9 | 41.9 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.