Zahidullah Kamal betting stats, splits & projections
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 12 | 156 | 175 | 14.2 | 89.1 | 6.9 | 43.4 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 6 | 11 | 0 | 11.0 | — | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where Zahidullah Kamal scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)LOW sample
70 runs off 68 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 102.9 vs 89.1 overall, average 14.0 vs 14.2 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)LOW sample
52 runs off 75 balls in 10 T20 matches — strike rate 69.3 vs 89.1 overall, average 8.7 vs 14.2 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Germany | T20 | 2 | 54 | 61 | 27.0 | 88.5 | 8.2 | 44.3 | LOW |
| Sweden | T20 | 2 | 32 | 43 | 32.0 | 74.4 | 4.7 | 48.8 | LOW |
| Cyprus | T20 | 2 | 45 | 40 | 22.5 | 112.5 | 10.0 | 37.5 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Kerava National Cricket Ground | T20 | 4 | 58 | 69 | 14.5 | 84.1 | 7.2 | 46.4 | LOW |
| Botkyrka Cricket Center, Stockholm | T20 | 4 | 34 | 48 | 11.3 | 70.8 | 4.2 | 50.0 | LOW |
| Happy Valley Ground | T20 | 2 | 45 | 40 | 22.5 | 112.5 | 10.0 | 37.5 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 12 | 156 | 175 | 14.2 | 89.1 | 6.9 | 43.4 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 10 | 87 | 99 | 12.4 | 87.9 | 5.1 | 36.4 | LOW |
| powerplay | T20 | 6 | 49 | 53 | 49.0 | 92.5 | 11.3 | 56.6 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 10 | 52 | 75 | 8.7 | 69.3 | 4.0 | 53.3 | LOW |
| SPIN | T20 | 9 | 70 | 68 | 14.0 | 102.9 | 10.3 | 39.7 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 5 | 34 | 32 | — | 106.3 | 6.3 | 28.1 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.