ZB Lion-Cachet betting stats, splits & projections
All-rounder
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | ODI | 6 | 155 | 207 | 25.8 | 74.9 | 6.8 | 49.8 | MEDIUM |
| overall | LIST_A | 6 | 92 | 164 | 15.3 | 56.1 | 7.3 | 68.9 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 12 | 146 | 137 | 12.2 | 106.6 | 9.5 | 33.6 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 180 | 206 | 10 | 6.9 | 20.6 | MEDIUM |
| overall | ODI | 128 | 98 | 7 | 4.6 | 14.0 | LOW |
| overall | LIST_A | 32 | 27 | 1 | 5.1 | 27.0 | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where ZB Lion-Cachet scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: PACE (ODI)LOW sample
99 runs off 107 balls in 4 ODI matches — strike rate 92.5 vs 74.9 overall, average 49.5 vs 25.8 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: SPIN (ODI)LOW sample
55 runs off 99 balls in 5 ODI matches — strike rate 55.6 vs 74.9 overall, average 13.8 vs 25.8 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)LOW sample
76 runs off 80 balls in 10 T20 matches — strike rate 95.0 vs 106.6 overall, average 12.7 vs 12.2 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)LOW sample
79 runs off 87 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 90.8 vs 106.6 overall, average 15.8 vs 12.2 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Scotland | ODI | 2 | 83 | 109 | 41.5 | 76.1 | 7.3 | 54.1 | LOW |
| United Arab Emirates | ODI | 2 | 64 | 81 | 32.0 | 79.0 | 6.2 | 39.5 | LOW |
| Gloucestershire | LIST_A | 1 | 27 | 56 | 27.0 | 48.2 | 5.4 | 67.9 | LOW |
| Worcestershire | LIST_A | 1 | 34 | 50 | 34.0 | 68.0 | 10.0 | 66.0 | LOW |
| Jersey | T20 | 1 | 50 | 43 | 50.0 | 116.3 | 11.6 | 27.9 | LOW |
| United States of America | T20 | 3 | 26 | 32 | 8.7 | 81.3 | 6.3 | 50.0 | LOW |
Bowling
| United Arab Emirates | ODI | 50 | 17 | 2 | 2.0 | 8.5 | LOW |
| Nepal | T20 | 50 | 62 | 4 | 7.4 | 15.5 | LOW |
| Namibia | ODI | 42 | 26 | 4 | 3.7 | 6.5 | LOW |
| Canada | T20 | 42 | 45 | 1 | 6.4 | 45.0 | LOW |
| Scotland | ODI | 36 | 55 | 1 | 9.2 | 55.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| VRA Ground, Amstelveen | ODI | 2 | 125 | 152 | 62.5 | 82.2 | 7.2 | 46.1 | MEDIUM |
| County Ground, Bristol | LIST_A | 1 | 27 | 56 | 27.0 | 48.2 | 5.4 | 67.9 | LOW |
| County Ground, New Road, Worcester | LIST_A | 1 | 34 | 50 | 34.0 | 68.0 | 10.0 | 66.0 | LOW |
| Sportpark Westvliet, Voorburg | T20 | 2 | 50 | 44 | 25.0 | 113.6 | 11.4 | 29.5 | LOW |
| Sportpark Maarschalkerweerd, Utrecht | ODI | 2 | 22 | 38 | 11.0 | 57.9 | 5.3 | 55.3 | LOW |
| Sportpark Maarschalkerweerd, Utrecht | T20 | 3 | 27 | 35 | 9.0 | 77.1 | 2.9 | 45.7 | LOW |
| County Ground, Hove | LIST_A | 2 | 15 | 32 | 7.5 | 46.9 | 6.3 | 71.9 | LOW |
Bowling
| Titwood, Glasgow | T20 | 74 | 88 | 6 | 7.1 | 14.7 | LOW |
| Sportpark Maarschalkerweerd, Utrecht | T20 | 52 | 50 | 3 | 5.8 | 16.7 | LOW |
| Sportpark Maarschalkerweerd, Utrecht | ODI | 48 | 42 | 1 | 5.3 | 42.0 | LOW |
| Wanderers Cricket Ground, Windhoek | ODI | 42 | 26 | 4 | 3.7 | 6.5 | LOW |
| VRA Ground, Amstelveen | ODI | 38 | 30 | 2 | 4.7 | 15.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | ODI | 6 | 155 | 207 | 25.8 | 74.9 | 6.8 | 49.8 | MEDIUM |
| Unknown | LIST_A | 6 | 92 | 164 | 15.3 | 56.1 | 7.3 | 68.9 | MEDIUM |
| Unknown | T20 | 12 | 146 | 137 | 12.2 | 106.6 | 9.5 | 33.6 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 180 | 206 | 10 | 6.9 | 20.6 | MEDIUM |
| Unknown | ODI | 128 | 98 | 7 | 4.6 | 14.0 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | ODI | 4 | 132 | 168 | 66.0 | 78.6 | 7.1 | 48.2 | MEDIUM |
| middle | LIST_A | 6 | 72 | 120 | 14.4 | 60.0 | 7.5 | 66.7 | MEDIUM |
| middle | T20 | 8 | 79 | 87 | 15.8 | 90.8 | 5.7 | 35.6 | LOW |
| powerplay | LIST_A | 3 | 13 | 37 | — | 35.1 | 5.4 | 81.1 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 132 | 150 | 6 | 6.8 | 25.0 | LOW |
| middle | ODI | 120 | 94 | 5 | 4.7 | 18.8 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | LIST_A | 5 | 65 | 111 | 16.3 | 58.6 | 8.1 | 66.7 | LOW |
| PACE | ODI | 4 | 99 | 107 | 49.5 | 92.5 | 9.3 | 41.1 | LOW |
| SPIN | ODI | 5 | 55 | 99 | 13.8 | 55.6 | 4.0 | 59.6 | LOW |
| SPIN | T20 | 10 | 76 | 80 | 12.7 | 95.0 | 7.5 | 35.0 | LOW |
| SPIN | LIST_A | 4 | 21 | 40 | 10.5 | 52.5 | 5.0 | 72.5 | LOW |
| PACE | T20 | 6 | 56 | 38 | 14.0 | 147.4 | 15.8 | 23.7 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.