Zeshan Arif betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 24 | 360 | 257 | 18.9 | 140.1 | 21.4 | 44.7 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 18 | 39 | 1 | 13.0 | 39.0 | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where Zeshan Arif scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
223 runs off 137 balls in 18 T20 matches — strike rate 162.8 vs 140.1 overall, average 22.3 vs 18.9 overall.
- Venue: Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County (T20)LOW sample
141 runs off 84 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 167.9 vs 140.1 overall, average 23.5 vs 18.9 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)LOW sample
195 runs off 114 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 171.1 vs 140.1 overall, average 48.8 vs 18.9 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)LOW sample
100 runs off 84 balls in 16 T20 matches — strike rate 119.0 vs 140.1 overall, average 16.7 vs 18.9 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)LOW sample
116 runs off 115 balls in 16 T20 matches — strike rate 100.9 vs 140.1 overall, average 8.9 vs 18.9 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Romania | T20 | 7 | 116 | 80 | 23.2 | 145.0 | 22.5 | 48.8 | LOW |
| Malta | T20 | 2 | 45 | 30 | 22.5 | 150.0 | 23.3 | 36.7 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County | T20 | 8 | 141 | 84 | 23.5 | 167.9 | 29.8 | 47.6 | LOW |
| GB Oval, Szodliget | T20 | 4 | 73 | 54 | 24.3 | 135.2 | 18.5 | 38.9 | LOW |
| Marsa Sports Club | T20 | 3 | 76 | 54 | 25.3 | 140.7 | 20.4 | 27.8 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 24 | 360 | 257 | 18.9 | 140.1 | 21.4 | 44.7 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 16 | 116 | 115 | 8.9 | 100.9 | 11.3 | 50.4 | LOW |
| powerplay | T20 | 9 | 195 | 114 | 48.8 | 171.1 | 30.7 | 39.5 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 18 | 223 | 137 | 22.3 | 162.8 | 26.3 | 40.9 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 16 | 100 | 84 | 16.7 | 119.0 | 16.7 | 48.8 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 9 | 37 | 36 | 12.3 | 102.8 | 13.9 | 50.0 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.